[cdwg] Lustre Development Community Tree Maintenance Q4 2011 report

[Peter Bojanic]

Hi Pam,

Is there any kind of test or other quality report that shows:
- defect density before and over the course of development (defects injected; latent defects discovered; defects removed)
- tests executed; number of tests passed vs. failed per test case
- what is the release criteria for 2.2, particularly with respect to quality attributes (e.g. zero blocker or critical defects)
- manifest and description of new regression test cases added corresponding to new features

This way OpenSFS can monitor not only the success landing of deliverables but also the overall health of the release branch.

Many thanks,
Bojanic

On 2012-01-23, at 19:17 , Hamilton, Pam wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Attached is the final version of the first quarterly report from Whamcloud for the Lustre Development Community Tree Maintenance contract. Please let me know if you have any questions/comments.
> 
> Regards,
> Pam
> 
> ___________________________________
> Pam Hamilton
> Lawrence Livermore National Lab 
> P.O. Box 808, L-556
> Livermore, CA  94551-9900
> E-Mail:  pgh at llnl.gov
> Phone:  925-423-1332          Fax:  925-423-8719
> 
> 
> <OpenSFS-Whamcloud Tree Report - Q4 2011 FINAL.pdf>_______________________________________________
> cdwg mailing list
> cdwg at lists.opensfs.org
> http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/cdwg-opensfs.org