[cdwg] Make Lustre 2.5 a maintenance release?

[Nic Henke]

Sorry for the delay - but Xyratex would endorse this approach.

 I think there is a discussion to have with Intel for how to handle 2.4 -> 2.5 transition process and what we'd like to see therein. For instance (and this is not a Xyratex requirement!), do we greatly descope 2.5 in order to get a release with HSM server out as soon as possible ? 

Cheers,
Nic
Nicholas Henke • Senior Filesystem Developer
Xyratex
office: +1 (651)842 8471 • mobile: +1 (651)895 5795
www.xyratex.com
Connect with Xyratex

On Jun 4, 2013, at 1:22 PM, "Christopher J. Morrone" <morrone2 at llnl.gov> wrote:

> Folks,
> 
> Since there have been no responses, this will not be discussed in tomorrow's meeting.  This is an important decision, and one that we need to make soon, and advertise well.  If this is what your organization wants, please speak up.
> 
> Chris
> 
> On 05/22/2013 10:53 AM, Christopher J. Morrone wrote:
>> Lustre community:
>> 
>> As we all know, HSM is a Lustre feature that is desired by many, but was
>> not fully completed in time for the Lustre 2.4 release.  As a result,
>> many folks are wondering if Lustre 2.4 is really the best branch to
>> support for a long period of time (18 or more months).
>> 
>> HSM is very likely to be completed for 2.5, and multiple vendors and
>> organizations are planning to move to that version, and desire long term
>> support for that branch.
>> 
>> On the other hand, we have for some time been advertising quite widely
>> that Lustre 2.4 will begin the next significant maintenance branch, and
>> some organizations have built there plans around that guidance.
>> 
>> I would like to officially propose the following action:
>> 
>> 1) Announce that Lustre 2.4 will have maintenance releases as planned,
>> but the maintenance window has been shortened to just 6 months.  In
>> other words, we will only expect to see maintenance releases on Lustre
>> 2.4 branch for roughly 6 months.
>> 
>> 2) Announce that the Lustre 2.5 branch will be long term maintenance
>> branch.
>> 
>> Are there any objections?  Any adjustments that should be made to that
>> statement?
>> 
>> Chris
>> .
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cdwg mailing list
> cdwg at lists.opensfs.org
> http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/cdwg-opensfs.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensfs.org/pipermail/cdwg-opensfs.org/attachments/20130604/21b9f593/attachment-0002.htm>