[cdwg] Pending items to land on Lustre Tree

[Jones, Peter A]

Kevin

I think that the CDWG is the right place to review this information. It
would definitely be prudent to scrub the list before circulating it to
ensure that it only includes fixes relevant to master and not older
releases that are no longer relevant. It would also help if engineers
could mark any changes that do not need to land as abandoned in gerrit so
as to reduce the noise.

Thanks

Peter

On 6/11/13 9:34 AM, "Kevin Canady" <kevin_canady at xyratex.com> wrote:

>Chris, Peter and anyone else appropriate.
>
>I'm looking for suggestions on how to review and proceed with items
>awaiting landing.  Some of them are over 24months old.  I have a list of
>65 items which are pending landing.   Hopefully these contributions will
>further enhance and improve the Lustre experience for everyone.   I've
>requested, first, an internal review to make sure all contributions are
>valid, complete and have been properly submitted.
>
>Once that is done what is the best course for reviewing these items in
>order to bring them to a close (landed)?
>
>Should we post the list with ticket numbers to CDWG?
>
>Appreciate thoughts and suggestions.
>Kevin
>
>
>P. Kevin Canady
>Director, Business Development Lustre and HPC Services
>kevin_canady at xyratex.com
>O: 510-687-5475
>C: 415.505.7701 (best)
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>cdwg mailing list
>cdwg at lists.opensfs.org
>http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/cdwg-opensfs.org