[cdwg] Maintenance releaase status of 2.5/2.4

[Cory Spitz]

Chris,

What do you mean "when we officially announceŠ"  I didn't realize that we
had already decided.  Do you mean to say, "*if* we officially announceŠ"?

Thanks,
-Cory

On 6/27/13 1:13 PM, "Christopher J. Morrone" <morrone2 at llnl.gov> wrote:

>Bryan,
>
>We certainly have consensus among the small number of organizations that
>bothered to reply.  This will be on the Agenda for next Wednesday's call.
>
>When we officially announce that 2.5 will be a long term maintenance
>release, the we will explain that the maintenance period for 2.4 has
>been shortened dramatically.  No longer should folks expect that 2.4 is
>a branch that will be supported for years.  Instead its maintenance
>window might be only as long as it takes to get 2.5.0 released.  But we
>haven't discussed the exact date to advertise as the cut off.
>
>Chris
>
>On 06/27/2013 08:01 AM, Bryan Cote wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Did we get consensus on whether 2.5 will be a maintenance release, and
>> if so, what is the impact on 2.4?
>>
>> ==Bryan
>>
>> 
>>*________________________________________________________________________
>>______*
>>
>> *Bryan R. Cote **|**Sr. Product Manager *
>>
>> *M 603.557.3568**|**P 617.722.0090 Ext. 302 **|**F 617.722.6060*
>>
>> *100 North Washington Street **|**Boston, MA 02114*
>>
>> **
>>
>> cid:image002.jpg at 01CDFB24.4A1E3320**
>>
>> *www.terascala.com <http://www.terascala.com/> *
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdwg mailing list
>> cdwg at lists.opensfs.org
>> http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/cdwg-opensfs.org
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>cdwg mailing list
>cdwg at lists.opensfs.org
>http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/cdwg-opensfs.org