[cdwg] Maintenance releaase status of 2.5/2.4

[Cory Spitz]

Ok, I haven't heard of any objections either.

However, I'm more than a bit concerned that the CDWG may recommend that
b2_5 become a maintenance branch, but that we aren't prepared to turn out
releases from said branch.

Peter J. said, "maintenance releases and support is at the discretion of
the support providers" when talking about _other_ branches.  I'm not sure
that he was implying that Intel would substitute 2.4.x for 2.5.x on the
roadmap 
(https://wiki.hpdd.intel.com/display/PUB/Community+Lustre+Roadmap).  Since
Intel was putting out maintenance releases for the previous maintenance
branch, b2_1, I think that they need to be on-board with the suggestion to
move to b2_5.  Otherwise, the CDWG is going to have to find a way to turn
out 2.5.x releases.

Thanks,
-Cory



On 6/27/13 3:33 PM, "Christopher J. Morrone" <morrone2 at llnl.gov> wrote:

>Cory,
>
>We will have one final discussion on the July 3rd CDWG call.  Given that
>there have been no dissenting opinions on the mailing lists, I suspect
>that the discussion will be short and announcements will be circulated
>shortly after.
>
>So my powers of prognostication could be on the fritz, but I think it is
>fairly safe to say "when" at this point.
>
>Chris
>
>On 06/27/2013 11:25 AM, Cory Spitz wrote:
>> Chris,
>>
>> What do you mean "when we officially announceŠ"  I didn't realize that
>>we
>> had already decided.  Do you mean to say, "*if* we officially
>>announceŠ"?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Cory
>>
>> On 6/27/13 1:13 PM, "Christopher J. Morrone" <morrone2 at llnl.gov> wrote:
>>
>>> Bryan,
>>>
>>> We certainly have consensus among the small number of organizations
>>>that
>>> bothered to reply.  This will be on the Agenda for next Wednesday's
>>>call.
>>>
>>> When we officially announce that 2.5 will be a long term maintenance
>>> release, the we will explain that the maintenance period for 2.4 has
>>> been shortened dramatically.  No longer should folks expect that 2.4 is
>>> a branch that will be supported for years.  Instead its maintenance
>>> window might be only as long as it takes to get 2.5.0 released.  But we
>>> haven't discussed the exact date to advertise as the cut off.
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>> On 06/27/2013 08:01 AM, Bryan Cote wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Did we get consensus on whether 2.5 will be a maintenance release, and
>>>> if so, what is the impact on 2.4?
>>>>
>>>> ==Bryan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 
>>>>*______________________________________________________________________
>>>>__
>>>> ______*
>>>>
>>>> *Bryan R. Cote **|**Sr. Product Manager *
>>>>
>>>> *M 603.557.3568**|**P 617.722.0090 Ext. 302 **|**F 617.722.6060*
>>>>
>>>> *100 North Washington Street **|**Boston, MA 02114*
>>>>
>>>> **
>>>>
>>>> cid:image002.jpg at 01CDFB24.4A1E3320**
>>>>
>>>> *www.terascala.com <http://www.terascala.com/> *
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cdwg mailing list
>>>> cdwg at lists.opensfs.org
>>>> http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/cdwg-opensfs.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cdwg mailing list
>>> cdwg at lists.opensfs.org
>>> http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/cdwg-opensfs.org
>>
>> .
>>