[cdwg] 2.5 blockers list

[Jones, Peter A]

Cory

We discussed using the FixVersion to track targeted content for the 2.5
release some months back so I have been using the links from the project
dashboard in my regular updates on the release. I have shared a filter
that jumps to the 2.5 blockers so that you can subscribe to it -
https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/issues/?filter=10661 . Yes, both lists will be
in sync

Regards

Peter

On 9/26/13 10:57 AM, "Cory Spitz" <spitzcor at cray.com> wrote:

>If we create a filter, than users can subscribe as well so I'd still like
>to see the blocker list created and managed regardless of search options.
>
>Are we going to micro-manage the Fix Version/s field in the tickets
>though?  If we decide a bug isn't a blocker for 2.5.0, someone will reset
>the Fix Version/s field to 2.5.1 right away?  We should be careful that
>the 2.5 blocker list and a list formed from tickets with Fix Version/s ==
>2.5 are exact duplicate lists.
>
>
>-Cory
>
>On 9/26/13 12:51 PM, "Christopher J. Morrone" <morrone2 at llnl.gov> wrote:
>
>>Since we are using the Fix Version/s field to mark tickets that are
>>targeted for resolution in a particular release, you can now use normal
>>Jira mechanisms to get that list.
>>
>>We have a link to the 2.5.0 Unresolved Issues here:
>>
>>   http://wiki.opensfs.org/Lustre_2.5.0
>>
>>Or you can always find it through Jira, through a number of paths.  Here
>>is one:
>>
>>   Select Projects->Lustre(LU) from the top tab.
>>   Select "Versions" from the left side.
>>   Click on "Lustre 2.5.0"
>>   Select "Issues" from the left
>>
>>Or here is a direct link to that search pattern:
>>
>> 
>>https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20LU%20AND%20fixVer
>>s
>>ion%20%3D%20%22Lustre%202.5.0%22%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20
>>A
>>ND%20priority%20%3D%20Blocker%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC
>>
>>Chris
>>
>>On 09/26/2013 10:32 AM, Cory Spitz wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> It seems that it is about time to create a 2.5 blockers list at
>>> jira.hpdd.intel.com.  I didn't see one yet though.  Should it be done
>>> now or later?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Cory
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cdwg mailing list
>>> cdwg at lists.opensfs.org
>>> http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/cdwg-opensfs.org
>>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>cdwg mailing list
>>cdwg at lists.opensfs.org
>>http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/cdwg-opensfs.org
>
>_______________________________________________
>cdwg mailing list
>cdwg at lists.opensfs.org
>http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/cdwg-opensfs.org