From peter.a.jones at intel.com Fri Jan 4 19:26:46 2013 From: peter.a.jones at intel.com (Jones, Peter A) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 19:26:46 +0000 Subject: [cdwg] Lustre 2.4 update - January 4th 2013 Message-ID: Hi there Here is an update on the Lustre 2.4 release. Details of the scope of the release are at http://wiki.whamcloud.com/display/Releases/Lustre+2.4+Scope+Statement Landings ======== -A number of landings made - see http://git.whamcloud.com/?p=fs/lustre-release.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/master -Patches to enable fedora 18 clients (3.6 kernel) landed (LU-1994 and LU-2148) Testing ======= -Testing on the 2.3.58 tag is underway Blockers ======== -Full list available at http://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=10292 -If there are any issues not presently marked as blockers that you believe should be, please let me know Other ===== -Feature freeze for 2.4 will be on January 31st; please ensure that any content you wish to include in this release has been uploaded into gerrit for review well in advance of this deadline to allow ample time for completion of reviews and testing; bug fixes and minor enhancements (kernel updates etc) will still be able to land for some weeks beyond this date Thanks Peter From hamilton5 at llnl.gov Mon Jan 7 16:56:36 2013 From: hamilton5 at llnl.gov (Hamilton, Pam) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 16:56:36 +0000 Subject: [cdwg] Lustre Development Community Tree Maintenance Q4 CY2012 report Message-ID: Hi all, Attached is the Q4 CY2012 quarterly report from Intel/Whamcloud for the Lustre Development Community Tree Maintenance contract. Please send any questions/comments to cdwg at lists.opensfs.org. Regards, Pam ___________________________________ Pam Hamilton Lawrence Livermore National Lab P.O. Box 808, L-556 Livermore, CA  94551-9900 E-Mail:  pgh at llnl.gov Phone:  925-423-1332          Fax:  925-423-8719 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenSFS-Intel Tree Report - Q4 2012 FINAL.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 546335 bytes Desc: OpenSFS-Intel Tree Report - Q4 2012 FINAL.pdf URL: From hamilton5 at llnl.gov Fri Jan 11 20:20:22 2013 From: hamilton5 at llnl.gov (Hamilton, Pam) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 20:20:22 +0000 Subject: [cdwg] FW: OpenSFS Community Development WG call In-Reply-To: <0FDB26BEF446DE468FBDCFCA8D7205BE0143B7BAB266@NSPEXMBX-C.the-lab.llnl.gov> References: <0FDB26BEF446DE468FBDCFCA8D7205BE0143B7BAB266@NSPEXMBX-C.the-lab.llnl.gov> Message-ID: Hi all, We will have an OpenSFS Community Development Working Group conference call next Wednesday, January 16th, at 9am Pacific. Agenda: • Lustre Development Community Tree Maintenance Contract update – I’ll try to have some draft requirements up on the wiki before the call • OpenSFS Community Survey 2013 – Attached are the results from last year’s survey so we can decide if any of the questions need to be tweaked • Open discussion Call-in: 866-914-3976 (925-424-8105) Passcode: 534986# Regards, Pam -----Original Appointment----- From: Hamilton, Pam Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 10:52 AM To: Hamilton, Pam; 'cdwg at lists.opensfs.org' Cc: 'pjones at whamcloud.com'; Leininger, Matthew L.; 'Reitz, Doug M.'; 'Cory Spitz'; 'Hill, Jason J.'; 'cfaber at gmail.com'; 'Ferber, Dan'; Gary, Mark R.; 'Alexander I Kulyavtsev'; 'Jodi Levi'; 'Felix, Evan J'; 'Hanafi, Mahmoud (ARC-TN)[Computer Sciences Corporation]'; Neitzel, Bryon S; Peter Bojanic Subject: OpenSFS Community Development WG call When: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 9:00 AM-10:00 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada). Where: Call-in: 866-914-3976 (925-424-8105) Passcode: 534986# Hi all, This is the bi-weekly conference call of the OpenSFS Community Development Working Group. Occurs every 2 weeks on Wednesday effective 8/15/2012 from 9:00 AM to 10:00 AM Pacific. Call-in: 866-914-3976 (925-424-8105) Passcode: 534986# Regards, Pam -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 3234 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenSFS Survey Results June 2012.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 523924 bytes Desc: OpenSFS Survey Results June 2012.pdf URL: From hamilton5 at llnl.gov Wed Jan 16 06:04:17 2013 From: hamilton5 at llnl.gov (Hamilton, Pam) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 06:04:17 +0000 Subject: [cdwg] Community Tree contract requirements Message-ID: Hi all, I've started a page on the OpenSFS wiki to capture our requirements for the Lustre Community Tree Development contract refresh. Please take a look and feel free to update: http://wiki.opensfs.org/Community_Tree_Development_Contract We'll begin discussions on this week's call. John Fuchs-Chesney is working things from Intel's side. John stated in an email to me that they are drafting "an amendment 'template' for the contract, which we can mutually use -- Intel will want to make some changes to put the assignment on record, and also to propose a small change to the indemnification section, to align with Intel standards. We are anticipating that we can then send you the amendment template, and you'll be able to incorporate the contract changes you want to propose, and we can proceed from there." Regards, Pam ___________________________________ Pam Hamilton Lawrence Livermore National Lab P.O. Box 808, L-556 Livermore, CA  94551-9900 E-Mail:  pgh at llnl.gov Phone:  925-423-1332          Fax:  925-423-8719 From roman_grigoryev at xyratex.com Fri Jan 18 18:46:20 2013 From: roman_grigoryev at xyratex.com (Roman Grigoryev) Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 22:46:20 +0400 Subject: [cdwg] New Test Framework Development - Automation_framework_evaluation statements Message-ID: <20130118224620.1cdab42d@wombat> Hi, I would like to discuss some statements from http://wiki.opensfs.org/Automation_framework_evaluation Some items from "Some requirements/desires for the automation framework" part looks like out of test execution framework. Item 'Should facilitate easy interpretation of test "trends"; i.e. statistical-based test results' is really far from execution, and it is part of reporting system. I prefer to avoid mixing execution and reporting systems. Item 'Collect test output status in a database looks too specific'. I prefer to re-define this requirements in something like this "be able to extend save test result in other formats" Item 'Able to automatically start testing based on various triggers, e.g. git commit hooks' looks too specific also. Git commit hooks just execute command line. So, requesting "initiating start from command line" is more simple. Which other triggers could be used exclude command line? Items 'Aware of multiple clusters' and 'Maintains a prioritizable job queue both' mean execution framework with dedicated server where multiple configuration and queues are kept and monitored. But with this architecture we are loosing mobility. I think, there is mixed requirements for testing framework and testing system for specific needs. Thanks, Roman From peter.a.jones at intel.com Sat Jan 19 04:13:18 2013 From: peter.a.jones at intel.com (Jones, Peter A) Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 04:13:18 +0000 Subject: [cdwg] Lustre 2.4 update - January 18th 2013 Message-ID: Hi there Here is an update on the Lustre 2.4 release. Details of the scope of the release are at http://wiki.whamcloud.com/display/Releases/Lustre+2.4+Scope+Statement Landings ======== -A number of landings made - see http://git.whamcloud.com/?p=fs/lustre-release.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/master - Wireshark support (LU-1434) - HSM Dirty Flag (LU-941) - Layout Lock Server (LU-1876) Testing ======= -Testing on the 2.3.58 tag is complete; 2.3.59 testing is underway Blockers ======== -Full list available at http://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=10292 -If there are any issues not presently marked as blockers that you believe should be, please let me know Other ===== -Feature freeze for 2.4 will be on January 31st; please ensure that any content you wish to include in this release has been uploaded into gerrit for review well in advance of this deadline to allow ample time for completion of reviews and testing; bug fixes and minor enhancements (kernel updates etc) will still be able to land for some weeks beyond this date Thanks Peter From roman_grigoryev at xyratex.com Tue Jan 22 09:41:26 2013 From: roman_grigoryev at xyratex.com (Roman Grigoryev) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:41:26 +0400 Subject: [cdwg] possibility to upload files to OpenSFS wiki Message-ID: <20130122134126.6558106a@wombat> Hi, i want to upload some files to new OpenSFS but looks like current setup doesn't support it. Could we add/enable this feature for mediawiki? -- Thanks, Roman From hamilton5 at llnl.gov Fri Jan 25 22:55:38 2013 From: hamilton5 at llnl.gov (Hamilton, Pam) Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 22:55:38 +0000 Subject: [cdwg] Next call for the OpenSFS Community Development Working Group Message-ID: Hi all, Our next CDWG call is currently scheduled for Wednesday, January 30th, at 9am Pacific. I have a conflict during that time so we have two choices. Someone else can volunteer to facilitate the call or we can reschedule it for a different time. The only other time I have available on the same day is 1:30pm Pacific. I'm also available on Thursday, January 31st, between 10:30am and noon Pacific. Please let me know your availability for a different time or if you'd be will to facilitate the call at the original time. Thanks, Pam ___________________________________ Pam Hamilton Lawrence Livermore National Lab P.O. Box 808, L-556 Livermore, CA  94551-9900 E-Mail:  pgh at llnl.gov Phone:  925-423-1332          Fax:  925-423-8719 From morrone2 at llnl.gov Fri Jan 25 23:08:14 2013 From: morrone2 at llnl.gov (Christopher J. Morrone) Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 15:08:14 -0800 Subject: [cdwg] Next call for the OpenSFS Community Development Working Group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5103105E.5090903@llnl.gov> I am willing to run the call. There is likely much to discuss judging from the last call and the TWG PAC call this week. I am also available at the alternate times. Chris On 01/25/2013 02:55 PM, Hamilton, Pam wrote: > Hi all, > > Our next CDWG call is currently scheduled for Wednesday, January 30th, at 9am Pacific. I have a conflict during that time so we have two choices. Someone else can volunteer to facilitate the call or we can reschedule it for a different time. The only other time I have available on the same day is 1:30pm Pacific. I'm also available on Thursday, January 31st, between 10:30am and noon Pacific. > > Please let me know your availability for a different time or if you'd be will to facilitate the call at the original time. > > Thanks, > Pam > > ___________________________________ > Pam Hamilton > Lawrence Livermore National Lab > P.O. Box 808, L-556 > Livermore, CA 94551-9900 > E-Mail: pgh at llnl.gov > Phone: 925-423-1332 Fax: 925-423-8719 > > > _______________________________________________ > cdwg mailing list > cdwg at lists.opensfs.org > http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/cdwg-opensfs.org > From hamilton5 at llnl.gov Mon Jan 28 19:10:06 2013 From: hamilton5 at llnl.gov (Hamilton, Pam) Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 19:10:06 +0000 Subject: [cdwg] FW: OpenSFS Community Development WG call In-Reply-To: <0FDB26BEF446DE468FBDCFCA8D7205BE0143B7BAB266@NSPEXMBX-C.the-lab.llnl.gov> References: <0FDB26BEF446DE468FBDCFCA8D7205BE0143B7BAB266@NSPEXMBX-C.the-lab.llnl.gov> Message-ID: Hi all, Chris Morrone has graciously volunteered to facilitate this week’s CDWG call. The call will be at our normal time, Wednesday, January 30th, at 9am Pacific. Agenda: • OpenSFS Community Survey 2013 – Here is a link to the proposed survey, please take a look at it before the call so we can decide if it’s good to go: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/LWQC8LM • Lustre 2.4 feature freeze update • Open discussion Call-in: 866-914-3976 (925-424-8105) Passcode: 534986# Regards, Pam -----Original Appointment----- From: Hamilton, Pam Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 10:52 AM To: Hamilton, Pam; 'cdwg at lists.opensfs.org' Cc: Leininger, Matthew L.; Gary, Mark R.; Quinn, Terri; 'pjones at whamcloud.com'; 'Reitz, Doug M.'; 'Cory Spitz'; 'Hill, Jason J.'; 'cfaber at gmail.com'; 'Ferber, Dan'; 'Alexander I Kulyavtsev'; 'Jodi Levi'; 'Felix, Evan J'; 'Hanafi, Mahmoud (ARC-TN)[Computer Sciences Corporation]'; 'Neitzel, Bryon S'; 'Peter Bojanic'; Dilger, Andreas Subject: OpenSFS Community Development WG call When: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 9:00 AM-10:00 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada). Where: Call-in: 866-914-3976 (925-424-8105) Passcode: 534986# Hi all, This is the bi-weekly conference call of the OpenSFS Community Development Working Group. Occurs every 2 weeks on Wednesday effective 8/15/2012 from 9:00 AM to 10:00 AM Pacific. Call-in: 866-914-3976 (925-424-8105) Passcode: 534986# Regards, Pam -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 3199 bytes Desc: not available URL: From morrone2 at llnl.gov Wed Jan 30 18:10:37 2013 From: morrone2 at llnl.gov (Christopher J. Morrone) Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 10:10:37 -0800 Subject: [cdwg] Notes from call on 1/30/13 In-Reply-To: References: <0FDB26BEF446DE468FBDCFCA8D7205BE0143B7BAB266@NSPEXMBX-C.the-lab.llnl.gov> Message-ID: <5109621D.6000100@llnl.gov> In attendance for the CDWG call today were: Nic Henke (Xyratex) Andreas Dilger (Intel) Peter Jones (Intel) Bryon Neitzel (Intel) Jodi Levi (Intel) James Simmons (ORNL) Chris Morrone (LLNL) Community Survey ---------------- Chris suggested providing more granularity for distributions (instead of "RHEL 6.X", do "RHEL 6.1", 6.2, 6.3, etc.). Might be nice to know, but would make a very crowded set of radio boxes. Peter will consider it, but can stick to current question style if it would make the survey too cluttered. No other comments. Lustre 2.4 feature freeze update -------------------------------- Peter reports that the following features are likely to land in time for 2.4: NRS (Network Request Scheduler) 4MB I/O support These features are close, but there landing is not yet definite (and will require at least a few more days): HSM - full HSM will not be in 2.4, but 2.4 client support should land DNE phase 1 LFSCK Tool for migration from 1.8 Nick requested updates on the CDWG list and/or other major list Lustre mailing list. ORNL pre-2.4 test shot on Jaguar -------------------------------- James discussed the results of the recent tests of the code from master/pre-2.4 on Jaguar. It went "more smoothly than we've experienced in the past" Only one job didn't complete, and probably legitimately ran out of disk space Noted that Cray 1.8 clients did not work with the new servers Tests included, ior, mdtest, s3d Other ----- James asked if LU-1812 (Fedora 18 support) could still land after the "feature freeze" date. Peter said that LU-1812 is considered a "minor enhancement", and since it is well on its way to completion and has little to no impact on the rest of the code, it is not constrained by the "feature freeze" date. Andreas asked about the two competing FC18/SP2 patche series. James reported that they are working together and have consolidated most of their work. Some patches for ldiskfs not yet merged, but in the works. James asked about patchless server for 2.4. We are close to patchless, but it looks like 2.4 will not quite eliminate the patches. Therefore the FC18/SP2 patches should be included. Andreas mentioned that Xyratex submitted mdraid patches to add to the kernel patch series. Those have a good chance to land for 2.4. When we go patchless, they'll need to move somewhere else. Would be nice if Xyratex can get those patches landed upstream. Chris On 01/28/2013 11:10 AM, Hamilton, Pam wrote: > Hi all, > Chris Morrone has graciously volunteered to facilitate this week’s CDWG > call. The call will be at our normal time, Wednesday, January 30th, at > 9am Pacific. > Agenda: > > * OpenSFS Community Survey 2013 – Here is a link to the proposed > survey, please take a look at it before the call so we can decide if > it’s good to go: > > _http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/LWQC8LM_ > > * Lustre 2.4 feature freeze update > * Open discussion > > Call-in: 866-914-3976 (925-424-8105) Passcode: 534986# > Regards, > Pam From carrier at cray.com Thu Jan 31 18:07:14 2013 From: carrier at cray.com (John Carrier) Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 18:07:14 +0000 Subject: [cdwg] Notes from call on 1/30/13 In-Reply-To: <5109621D.6000100@llnl.gov> References: <0FDB26BEF446DE468FBDCFCA8D7205BE0143B7BAB266@NSPEXMBX-C.the-lab.llnl.gov> <5109621D.6000100@llnl.gov> Message-ID: My understanding is that DNE and LFSCK 1.5 are complete, but need extra time to get rebased against the new OSD master and checked into gerrit. Is there an update on how much longer these check-ins will take? My apologies for missing the call. Thanks, --jc -----Original Message----- From: cdwg-bounces at lists.opensfs.org [mailto:cdwg-bounces at lists.opensfs.org] On Behalf Of Christopher J. Morrone Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 10:11 AM To: cdwg at lists.opensfs.org Subject: [cdwg] Notes from call on 1/30/13 In attendance for the CDWG call today were: Nic Henke (Xyratex) Andreas Dilger (Intel) Peter Jones (Intel) Bryon Neitzel (Intel) Jodi Levi (Intel) James Simmons (ORNL) Chris Morrone (LLNL) Community Survey ---------------- Chris suggested providing more granularity for distributions (instead of "RHEL 6.X", do "RHEL 6.1", 6.2, 6.3, etc.). Might be nice to know, but would make a very crowded set of radio boxes. Peter will consider it, but can stick to current question style if it would make the survey too cluttered. No other comments. Lustre 2.4 feature freeze update -------------------------------- Peter reports that the following features are likely to land in time for 2.4: NRS (Network Request Scheduler) 4MB I/O support These features are close, but there landing is not yet definite (and will require at least a few more days): HSM - full HSM will not be in 2.4, but 2.4 client support should land DNE phase 1 LFSCK Tool for migration from 1.8 Nick requested updates on the CDWG list and/or other major list Lustre mailing list. ORNL pre-2.4 test shot on Jaguar -------------------------------- James discussed the results of the recent tests of the code from master/pre-2.4 on Jaguar. It went "more smoothly than we've experienced in the past" Only one job didn't complete, and probably legitimately ran out of disk space Noted that Cray 1.8 clients did not work with the new servers Tests included, ior, mdtest, s3d Other ----- James asked if LU-1812 (Fedora 18 support) could still land after the "feature freeze" date. Peter said that LU-1812 is considered a "minor enhancement", and since it is well on its way to completion and has little to no impact on the rest of the code, it is not constrained by the "feature freeze" date. Andreas asked about the two competing FC18/SP2 patche series. James reported that they are working together and have consolidated most of their work. Some patches for ldiskfs not yet merged, but in the works. James asked about patchless server for 2.4. We are close to patchless, but it looks like 2.4 will not quite eliminate the patches. Therefore the FC18/SP2 patches should be included. Andreas mentioned that Xyratex submitted mdraid patches to add to the kernel patch series. Those have a good chance to land for 2.4. When we go patchless, they'll need to move somewhere else. Would be nice if Xyratex can get those patches landed upstream. Chris On 01/28/2013 11:10 AM, Hamilton, Pam wrote: > Hi all, > Chris Morrone has graciously volunteered to facilitate this week's > CDWG call. The call will be at our normal time, Wednesday, January > 30th, at 9am Pacific. > Agenda: > > * OpenSFS Community Survey 2013 - Here is a link to the proposed > survey, please take a look at it before the call so we can decide if > it's good to go: > > _http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/LWQC8LM_ > > * Lustre 2.4 feature freeze update > * Open discussion > > Call-in: 866-914-3976 (925-424-8105) Passcode: 534986# Regards, Pam _______________________________________________ cdwg mailing list cdwg at lists.opensfs.org http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/cdwg-opensfs.org From peter.a.jones at intel.com Thu Jan 31 19:15:38 2013 From: peter.a.jones at intel.com (Jones, Peter A) Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 19:15:38 +0000 Subject: [cdwg] Notes from call on 1/30/13 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Hi John We'll get all the wiki pages relating to the release cleaned up next week and I'll be sending a note out once this is done. Peter On 1/31/13 10:07 AM, "John Carrier" wrote: > >My understanding is that DNE and LFSCK 1.5 are complete, but need extra >time to get rebased against the new OSD master and checked into gerrit. > >Is there an update on how much longer these check-ins will take? > >My apologies for missing the call. Thanks, > >--jc > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: cdwg-bounces at lists.opensfs.org >[mailto:cdwg-bounces at lists.opensfs.org] On Behalf Of Christopher J. >Morrone >Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 10:11 AM >To: cdwg at lists.opensfs.org >Subject: [cdwg] Notes from call on 1/30/13 > >In attendance for the CDWG call today were: > > Nic Henke (Xyratex) > Andreas Dilger (Intel) > Peter Jones (Intel) > Bryon Neitzel (Intel) > Jodi Levi (Intel) > James Simmons (ORNL) > Chris Morrone (LLNL) > >Community Survey >---------------- > >Chris suggested providing more granularity for distributions (instead of >"RHEL 6.X", do "RHEL 6.1", 6.2, 6.3, etc.). Might be nice to know, but >would make a very crowded set of radio boxes. Peter will consider it, >but can stick to current question style if it would make the survey too >cluttered. > >No other comments. > >Lustre 2.4 feature freeze update >-------------------------------- > >Peter reports that the following features are likely to land in time for >2.4: > > NRS (Network Request Scheduler) > 4MB I/O support > >These features are close, but there landing is not yet definite (and will >require at least a few more days): > > HSM - full HSM will not be in 2.4, but 2.4 client support should land > DNE phase 1 > LFSCK > Tool for migration from 1.8 > >Nick requested updates on the CDWG list and/or other major list Lustre >mailing list. > >ORNL pre-2.4 test shot on Jaguar >-------------------------------- > >James discussed the results of the recent tests of the code from >master/pre-2.4 on Jaguar. > > It went "more smoothly than we've experienced in the past" > Only one job didn't complete, and probably legitimately ran out of > disk space > Noted that Cray 1.8 clients did not work with the new servers > Tests included, ior, mdtest, s3d > >Other >----- > >James asked if LU-1812 (Fedora 18 support) could still land after the >"feature freeze" date. Peter said that LU-1812 is considered a "minor >enhancement", and since it is well on its way to completion and has >little to no impact on the rest of the code, it is not constrained by the >"feature freeze" date. > >Andreas asked about the two competing FC18/SP2 patche series. James >reported that they are working together and have consolidated most of >their work. Some patches for ldiskfs not yet merged, but in the works. > >James asked about patchless server for 2.4. We are close to patchless, >but it looks like 2.4 will not quite eliminate the patches. Therefore >the FC18/SP2 patches should be included. > >Andreas mentioned that Xyratex submitted mdraid patches to add to the >kernel patch series. Those have a good chance to land for 2.4. When we >go patchless, they'll need to move somewhere else. Would be nice if >Xyratex can get those patches landed upstream. > >Chris > >On 01/28/2013 11:10 AM, Hamilton, Pam wrote: >> Hi all, >> Chris Morrone has graciously volunteered to facilitate this week's >> CDWG call. The call will be at our normal time, Wednesday, January >> 30th, at 9am Pacific. >> Agenda: >> >> * OpenSFS Community Survey 2013 - Here is a link to the proposed >> survey, please take a look at it before the call so we can decide if >> it's good to go: >> >> _http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/LWQC8LM_ >> >> * Lustre 2.4 feature freeze update >> * Open discussion >> >> Call-in: 866-914-3976 (925-424-8105) Passcode: 534986# Regards, Pam > >_______________________________________________ >cdwg mailing list >cdwg at lists.opensfs.org >http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/cdwg-opensfs.org >_______________________________________________ >cdwg mailing list >cdwg at lists.opensfs.org >http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/cdwg-opensfs.org