From peter.a.jones at intel.com Wed Oct 2 21:32:22 2013 From: peter.a.jones at intel.com (Jones, Peter A) Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 21:32:22 +0000 Subject: [cdwg] 2.5 Code Freeze in effect Message-ID: Hi there Just a reminder that master is presently subject to code freeze ahead of the 2.5.0 release targeted for release at the end of this month. This means that at present only two kinds of landings are permitted 1. Fixes for issues considered to be blockers for the release (see https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/issues/?filter=10661) 2. Fixes that affect tests/man pages only We will branch b2_5 in the near future (probably in the next 1-2 weeks) at which point master will reopen for all landings (including features) ahead of the 2.6 release. Regards Peter From morrone2 at llnl.gov Wed Oct 9 15:35:12 2013 From: morrone2 at llnl.gov (Morrone, Chris) Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 15:35:12 +0000 Subject: [cdwg] CDWG call today Message-ID: <6DEBE346E120D0419BF3EE98CB0594AC167858FA@PRDEXMBX-07.the-lab.llnl.gov> Hi all, Sorry for the later reminder. We will have a Community Development Working Group (CDWG) call on TODAY, October 9, at 9:00am PDT. Agenda: * Review action items * Lustre 2.5.0 status update * Lustre 2.6.0 planning Call-in: 866-914-3976 (925-424-8105) Passcode: 534986# Regards, Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jodi.levi at intel.com Wed Oct 9 16:01:30 2013 From: jodi.levi at intel.com (Levi, Jodi) Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 16:01:30 +0000 Subject: [cdwg] Lustre 2.6 Scope Statementq Message-ID: I have attached the 2.6 Scope Statement for review on the call today. Thank you! -Jodi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Lustre 2.6 ScopeStatement.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 35479 bytes Desc: Lustre 2.6 ScopeStatement.pdf URL: From peter.a.jones at intel.com Sat Oct 12 13:36:05 2013 From: peter.a.jones at intel.com (Jones, Peter A) Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 13:36:05 +0000 Subject: [cdwg] Lustre 2.5 update - October 11th 2013 Message-ID: Hi there Here is an update on the Lustre 2.5 release. Landings ======== -A number of landings made - see http://git.whamcloud.com/?p=fs/lustre-release.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/b2_5 Testing ======= -Testing on the 2.4.93 tag completed; testing on 2.5.0-RC1 tag underway -ORNL looking into options for testing RC1 Blockers ======== -None at present; if there are any issues not presently marked as blockers that you believe should be, please let me know Other ===== -Due to the current US government shutdown we are expecting to lose access to Hyperion (which we use for scale testing) early next week; we hope to be able to complete testing on RC1 by then, but this service will not be available to test any further release candidates. There was a discussion about this on the CDWG call earlier this week and we are looking into alternative options as a contingency. -We encourage community members to test out the release candidate and to use JIRA (https://jira.hpdd.intel.com) to report any bugs encountered Thanks Peter PS/ You can also keep up to date with matters relating to the 2.5 release on the CDWG wiki - http://wiki.opensfs.org/Lustre_2.5.0 From oleg.drokin at intel.com Mon Oct 14 22:58:13 2013 From: oleg.drokin at intel.com (Drokin, Oleg) Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 22:58:13 +0000 Subject: [cdwg] split off b2_5 and new tags Message-ID: <4E63186E-7D92-48CD-8B19-26B8D9AC9A60@intel.com> Hello! The b2_5 branch was split off master branch, so the aster branch is now tracking future 2.6.0 development and is open for general landings. b2_5 is tagged 2.5.0-RC1and is undergoing testing Bye, Oleg From jodi.levi at intel.com Fri Oct 18 20:54:26 2013 From: jodi.levi at intel.com (Levi, Jodi) Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 20:54:26 +0000 Subject: [cdwg] Lustre 2.6 Test Plan_Draft Message-ID: I have attached the first draft of the Lustre 2.6 Release test plan. I am also attaching the latest version of the 2.6 Scope Statement with the updates from our last call. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you! -Jodi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 2.6 Test Plan_Draft.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 129083 bytes Desc: 2.6 Test Plan_Draft.pdf URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Releases-Lustre 2.6 ScopeStatement-v2.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 36506 bytes Desc: Releases-Lustre 2.6 ScopeStatement-v2.pdf URL: From green at linuxhacker.ru Mon Oct 14 16:00:31 2013 From: green at linuxhacker.ru (Oleg Drokin) Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:00:31 -0400 Subject: [cdwg] split off b2_5 and new tags Message-ID: Hello! The b2_5 branch was split off master branch, so the aster branch is now tracking future 2.6.0 development and is open for general landings. b2_5 is tagged 2.5.0-RC1and is undergoing testing Bye, Oleg From morrone2 at llnl.gov Tue Oct 22 18:46:21 2013 From: morrone2 at llnl.gov (Christopher J. Morrone) Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 11:46:21 -0700 Subject: [cdwg] [HPDD-discuss] New Lustre/HSM doc In-Reply-To: <52668B30.8080800@cea.fr> References: <52668B30.8080800@cea.fr> Message-ID: <5266C7FD.3070605@llnl.gov> Thanks! Apparently the tickets that track landing the documentation to the manual are LUDOC-93 and LUDOC-94. I think this suggests a good topic for the CDWG: making sure that documentation is included in release scope, so the documentation is available at the same time as a release. Chris On 10/22/2013 07:26 AM, DEGREMONT Aurelien wrote: > Hi > > As Lustre/HSM doc is not yet integrated in Lustre doc, here is the > latest version of Lustre/HSM doc, with the /proc names updated. > This doc is matching Lustre 2.5.0rc1 code. > > > Aurélien > > > _______________________________________________ > HPDD-discuss mailing list > HPDD-discuss at lists.01.org > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/hpdd-discuss > From morrone2 at llnl.gov Tue Oct 22 23:51:03 2013 From: morrone2 at llnl.gov (Christopher J. Morrone) Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 16:51:03 -0700 Subject: [cdwg] OpenSFS CDWG Call Message-ID: <52670F67.8000502@llnl.gov> Hi all, This is a reminder that we will have a Community Development Working Group (CDWG) call on Wednesday, October 23, at 9:00am PDT. Agenda: * Review action items * Lustre 2.5.0 status update * Lustre 2.6.0 planning Call-in: 866-914-3976 (925-424-8105) Passcode: 534986# Regards, Chris From morrone2 at llnl.gov Wed Oct 23 00:23:01 2013 From: morrone2 at llnl.gov (Christopher J. Morrone) Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 17:23:01 -0700 Subject: [cdwg] Lustre 2.6 Test Plan_Draft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <526716E5.4050603@llnl.gov> Jodi, I think we really need to close the gap between the 7 tickets listed in this scope statement and the 63 initial tickets targetting Lustre 2.6.0 in Jira. That is just too much of a disparity. I imagine that closing the gap will involve both removing the 2.6.0 Fix Version from some tickets and adding more work items to the scope document. I would also like to see something in the scope statement that covers documentation for the release. Chris On 10/18/2013 01:54 PM, Levi, Jodi wrote: > I have attached the first draft of the Lustre 2.6 Release test plan. I am also attaching the latest version of the 2.6 Scope Statement with the updates from our last call. > Please let me know if you have any questions. > Thank you! > -Jodi > > > > _______________________________________________ > cdwg mailing list > cdwg at lists.opensfs.org > http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/cdwg-opensfs.org > From peter.a.jones at intel.com Fri Oct 25 21:08:39 2013 From: peter.a.jones at intel.com (Jones, Peter A) Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 21:08:39 +0000 Subject: [cdwg] Lustre 2.6 Test Plan_Draft In-Reply-To: <526716E5.4050603@llnl.gov> Message-ID: Chris As per the discussion on this week's call. Let's use the label cdwgbl to mark issues that we think should be addressed in an upcoming release prior to scoping and resource allocation. Regards Peter On 10/22/13 5:23 PM, "Christopher J. Morrone" wrote: >Jodi, > >I think we really need to close the gap between the 7 tickets listed in >this scope statement and the 63 initial tickets targetting Lustre 2.6.0 >in Jira. That is just too much of a disparity. > >I imagine that closing the gap will involve both removing the 2.6.0 Fix >Version from some tickets and adding more work items to the scope >document. > >I would also like to see something in the scope statement that covers >documentation for the release. > >Chris > >On 10/18/2013 01:54 PM, Levi, Jodi wrote: >> I have attached the first draft of the Lustre 2.6 Release test plan. I >>am also attaching the latest version of the 2.6 Scope Statement with the >>updates from our last call. >> Please let me know if you have any questions. >> Thank you! >> -Jodi >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cdwg mailing list >> cdwg at lists.opensfs.org >> http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/cdwg-opensfs.org >> > >_______________________________________________ >cdwg mailing list >cdwg at lists.opensfs.org >http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/cdwg-opensfs.org From spitzcor at cray.com Fri Oct 25 21:10:49 2013 From: spitzcor at cray.com (Cory Spitz) Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 21:10:49 +0000 Subject: [cdwg] Autotest slave Message-ID: We have an auto test slave set up at IU, correct? Is there a process to follow to set up additional slaves? If not, would the CDWG support such an effort? Cray would like to host a test platform, if we can. Thanks, -Cory -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From peter.a.jones at intel.com Fri Oct 25 21:40:11 2013 From: peter.a.jones at intel.com (Jones, Peter A) Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 21:40:11 +0000 Subject: [cdwg] Lustre 2.5 update - October 25th 2013 Message-ID: Hi there Here is an update on the Lustre 2.5 release. Landings ======== -No landings made; code freeze in effect on b2_5; landings have commenced on master for the 2.6 release Testing ======= -Testing on 2.5.0-RC1 tag ongoing Blockers ======== -None at present; if there are any issues not presently marked as blockers that you believe should be, please let me know Other ===== -Testing on Hyperion suffered a relatively short outage due to the US Government shutdown and testing is back in service -We encourage community members to test out the release candidate and to use JIRA (https://jira.hpdd.intel.com) to report any bugs encountered Thanks Peter PS/ You can also keep up to date with matters relating to the 2.5 release on the CDWG wiki - http://wiki.opensfs.org/Lustre_2.5.0 From chris.gearing at intel.com Sat Oct 26 12:19:49 2013 From: chris.gearing at intel.com (Gearing, Chris) Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 12:19:49 +0000 Subject: [cdwg] Autotest slave In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, I don't think there is a slave at iu, or if there is a slave ot isn't talking to the Jenkins used by our test infrastructure. Chris -----Original Message----- From: Cory Spitz [spitzcor at cray.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 02:11 PM Pacific Standard Time To: cdwg at lists.opensfs.org Cc: Young Jong Pao; Gearing, Chris Subject: Autotest slave We have an auto test slave set up at IU, correct? Is there a process to follow to set up additional slaves? If not, would the CDWG support such an effort? Cray would like to host a test platform, if we can. Thanks, -Cory --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Corporation (UK) Limited Registered No. 1134945 (England) Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ VAT No: 860 2173 47 This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From peter.a.jones at intel.com Wed Oct 30 20:48:02 2013 From: peter.a.jones at intel.com (Jones, Peter A) Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 20:48:02 +0000 Subject: [cdwg] Lustre 2.5.0 Message-ID: Hi Chris I think that we are satisfied with the testing we have done for RC1 and would like to proceed with GA. Do you have anything else you think we should look at or shall we proceed with GA? Peter From morrone2 at llnl.gov Wed Oct 30 20:58:56 2013 From: morrone2 at llnl.gov (Christopher J. Morrone) Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:58:56 -0700 Subject: [cdwg] Lustre 2.5.0 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <52717310.4070107@llnl.gov> Peter, I am satisfied as well. You can proceed with the release. Chris On 10/30/2013 01:48 PM, Jones, Peter A wrote: > Hi Chris > > I think that we are satisfied with the testing we have done for RC1 and would like to proceed with GA. Do you have anything else you think we should look at or shall we proceed with GA? > > Peter > From peter.a.jones at intel.com Wed Oct 30 21:11:47 2013 From: peter.a.jones at intel.com (Jones, Peter A) Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 21:11:47 +0000 Subject: [cdwg] Lustre 2.5.0 released Message-ID: We are pleased to announce that the Lustre 2.5.0 Release has been declared GA and is available for download . You can also grab the source from git The major release includes a number of new features including: Hierarchal Storage Management (HSM) (LU-3608) – allows data to be transferred between different storage types Extended Attribute Cache (Xattr Cache) (LU-2869) - improved performance when reading extended attributes Fuller details can be found in the change log, the scope statement and the test matrix The following is a known issues in the Lustre 2.5.0 Release: LU-3833 : HSM does not check whether a file is sparse before archiving which could lead to unexpected results LU-4152: Under rare access patterns while re-exporting NFS it is possible that MDT threads might block until external action is performed on a file LU-4159: Lustre 2.4.x clients are unable to access a released file Work is in progress for these issues and it is likely that these will be addressed in the 2.5.1 release scheduled for Q1 2014. Please log any issues found in the issue tracking system We would like to thank OpenSFS for their contributions towards the cost of the release and also to all Lustre community members who have contributed to the release with code and/or testing.