[Comswg] OpenSFS Support Working Group draft white paper - Round 2

[John Carrier]

Hi Pam,

Your description of release mentions Redhat only.  I think this is appropriate for the servers, but many members are using other distributions on their cluster nodes.   What are the support plans for the Lustre clients for the OpenSFS distribution?

Oracle has stated that their Linux support is for OEL and other RHEL derivatives.  Clients will continue to be supported on all current distributions (SLES, RHEL, etc).

Thanks,

--jc


From: twg-bounces at lists.opensfs.org [mailto:twg-bounces at lists.opensfs.org] On Behalf Of Hamilton, Pam
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 8:31 PM
To: Execs at lists.opensfs.org; twg at lists.opensfs.org; rpwg at lists.opensfs.org; swg at lists.opensfs.org; comswg at lists.opensfs.org
Subject: [Twg] OpenSFS Support Working Group draft white paper - Round 2

Hi all,

Attached is another draft of the OpenSFS Support Working Group white paper. During support model discussions, the SWG felt we were lacking a good understanding of the high level requirements for OpenSFS and any release distributed by the organization. Without this understanding, we are struggling with developing the support model. Therefore, this draft of includes a section with what we see as high level requirements for OpenSFS. I'm sending to the execs and other working groups to get a discussion started and hopefully we can reach a consensus regarding the requirements.

Regards,
Pam

___________________________________
Pam Hamilton
Lawrence Livermore National Lab
P.O. Box 808, L-556
Livermore, CA  94551-9900
E-Mail:  pgh at llnl.gov
Phone:  925-423-1332          Fax:  925-423-8719
___________________________________

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensfs.org/pipermail/comswg-opensfs.org/attachments/20101207/8e0cd3ad/attachment-0002.htm>