From gshipman at ornl.gov Wed Dec 1 16:47:14 2010 From: gshipman at ornl.gov (Shipman, Galen M.) Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 11:47:14 -0500 Subject: [Comswg] Will miss today's meeting Message-ID: <78B84083-DC2C-423D-AEE5-93B3D5800195@ornl.gov> Sorry, I have a conflict today. I look forward to the meeting notes and the next meeting. - Galen From hamilton5 at llnl.gov Tue Dec 7 04:30:33 2010 From: hamilton5 at llnl.gov (Hamilton, Pam) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 20:30:33 -0800 Subject: [Comswg] OpenSFS Support Working Group draft white paper - Round 2 Message-ID: Hi all, Attached is another draft of the OpenSFS Support Working Group white paper. During support model discussions, the SWG felt we were lacking a good understanding of the high level requirements for OpenSFS and any release distributed by the organization. Without this understanding, we are struggling with developing the support model. Therefore, this draft of includes a section with what we see as high level requirements for OpenSFS. I'm sending to the execs and other working groups to get a discussion started and hopefully we can reach a consensus regarding the requirements. Regards, Pam ___________________________________ Pam Hamilton Lawrence Livermore National Lab P.O. Box 808, L-556 Livermore, CA 94551-9900 E-Mail: pgh at llnl.gov Phone: 925-423-1332 Fax: 925-423-8719 ___________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenSFS SWG white paper_ver3.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 23051 bytes Desc: OpenSFS SWG white paper_ver3.docx URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenSFS SWG white paper_ver3.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 307232 bytes Desc: OpenSFS SWG white paper_ver3.pdf URL: From seager1 at llnl.gov Tue Dec 7 14:55:10 2010 From: seager1 at llnl.gov (Seager, Mark K.) Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 06:55:10 -0800 Subject: [Comswg] COMSWG Telecon Today Message-ID: <6DAF24F9BB747E47A4BAE7A6F5B80C7DF5825BD35B@NSPEXMBX-A.the-lab.llnl.gov> I have a conflict with the Communications working group telecon today at 9AM PST that I can't avoid. So I won't be on the call. Does someone else want to chair the telecon today or should we cancel it? Regards, ++Mark ________________________________ Mark K. Seager Advanced Technology| Google Voice LLNL | The more original a discovery, the more 925-456-4214 POBOX 808, L-554 | obvious it seems afterwards. seager [at] 7000 East Ave. | -- Arthur Koestler llnl.gov Livermore, CA 94551| ________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From hamilton5 at llnl.gov Tue Dec 7 16:09:38 2010 From: hamilton5 at llnl.gov (Hamilton, Pam) Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 08:09:38 -0800 Subject: [Comswg] COMSWG Telecon Today In-Reply-To: <6DAF24F9BB747E47A4BAE7A6F5B80C7DF5825BD35B@NSPEXMBX-A.the-lab.llnl.gov> References: <6DAF24F9BB747E47A4BAE7A6F5B80C7DF5825BD35B@NSPEXMBX-A.the-lab.llnl.gov> Message-ID: Hi Mark, Today isn't the Communications working group telecon, that's tomorrow at 9am. The call today is the OpenSFS Members bi-weekly telecom. -Pam From: comswg-bounces at lists.opensfs.org [mailto:comswg-bounces at lists.opensfs.org] On Behalf Of Seager, Mark K. Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 6:55 AM To: comswg at lists.opensfs.org Subject: [Comswg] COMSWG Telecon Today I have a conflict with the Communications working group telecon today at 9AM PST that I can't avoid. So I won't be on the call. Does someone else want to chair the telecon today or should we cancel it? Regards, ++Mark ________________________________ Mark K. Seager Advanced Technology| Google Voice LLNL | The more original a discovery, the more 925-456-4214 POBOX 808, L-554 | obvious it seems afterwards. seager [at] 7000 East Ave. | -- Arthur Koestler llnl.gov Livermore, CA 94551| ________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gshipman at ornl.gov Tue Dec 7 16:54:42 2010 From: gshipman at ornl.gov (Shipman, Galen M.) Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 11:54:42 -0500 Subject: [Comswg] OpenSFS community meeting today Message-ID: <61720761-FE45-4134-A792-9235E69C691D@ornl.gov> The OpenSFS community meeting is scheduled today at 12:00 PM ET. 517-308-1709 Participant code: 5282795 please do join, we would like to get updates from the working group leads. Thanks, Galen From carrier at cray.com Tue Dec 7 17:46:06 2010 From: carrier at cray.com (John Carrier) Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 11:46:06 -0600 Subject: [Comswg] OpenSFS Support Working Group draft white paper - Round 2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Pam, Your description of release mentions Redhat only. I think this is appropriate for the servers, but many members are using other distributions on their cluster nodes. What are the support plans for the Lustre clients for the OpenSFS distribution? Oracle has stated that their Linux support is for OEL and other RHEL derivatives. Clients will continue to be supported on all current distributions (SLES, RHEL, etc). Thanks, --jc From: twg-bounces at lists.opensfs.org [mailto:twg-bounces at lists.opensfs.org] On Behalf Of Hamilton, Pam Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 8:31 PM To: Execs at lists.opensfs.org; twg at lists.opensfs.org; rpwg at lists.opensfs.org; swg at lists.opensfs.org; comswg at lists.opensfs.org Subject: [Twg] OpenSFS Support Working Group draft white paper - Round 2 Hi all, Attached is another draft of the OpenSFS Support Working Group white paper. During support model discussions, the SWG felt we were lacking a good understanding of the high level requirements for OpenSFS and any release distributed by the organization. Without this understanding, we are struggling with developing the support model. Therefore, this draft of includes a section with what we see as high level requirements for OpenSFS. I'm sending to the execs and other working groups to get a discussion started and hopefully we can reach a consensus regarding the requirements. Regards, Pam ___________________________________ Pam Hamilton Lawrence Livermore National Lab P.O. Box 808, L-556 Livermore, CA 94551-9900 E-Mail: pgh at llnl.gov Phone: 925-423-1332 Fax: 925-423-8719 ___________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From carrier at cray.com Tue Dec 7 18:49:25 2010 From: carrier at cray.com (John Carrier) Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 12:49:25 -0600 Subject: [Comswg] [Swg] OpenSFS Support Working Group draft white paper - Round 2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Pam, Dan raises a good point. If we're talking Lustre 2.x, then servers will only run on RHEL and its derivatives. But many of us are running Lustre 1.8.x on SLES and do not have the option of moving to RHEL without changing the hardware platform on which the servers are running. Is the support working group considering support for Lustre 1.8.x? Thanks, --jc From: Dan Ferber [mailto:dferber at whamcloud.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 9:56 AM To: John Carrier; Hamilton, Pam Subject: Re: [Swg] OpenSFS Support Working Group draft white paper - Round 2 I agree SLES (and RH) need to be added for clients. I know Oracle's support policy (for their current but not new customers and partners - and for 1.8 and not 2.0) is online, and here is Whamcloud's support plans, just as another datapoint: http://wiki.whamcloud.com/display/PUB/Support+Matrix [cid:image001.png at 01CB95FC.69DA4300] Dan [cid:image002.png at 01CB95FC.69DA4300] Dan Ferber Customer Service and Business Development Manager Office: +1 651-344-1846 Cell: +1 651-344-1846 Email: dferber at whamcloud.com From: John Carrier > Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 11:46:06 -0600 To: "Hamilton, Pam" > Cc: "comswg at lists.opensfs.org" >, "Execs at lists.opensfs.org" >, "swg at lists.opensfs.org" >, "twg at lists.opensfs.org" >, "rpwg at lists.opensfs.org" > Subject: Re: [Swg] OpenSFS Support Working Group draft white paper - Round 2 Hi Pam, Your description of release mentions Redhat only. I think this is appropriate for the servers, but many members are using other distributions on their cluster nodes. What are the support plans for the Lustre clients for the OpenSFS distribution? Oracle has stated that their Linux support is for OEL and other RHEL derivatives. Clients will continue to be supported on all current distributions (SLES, RHEL, etc). Thanks, --jc From: twg-bounces at lists.opensfs.org [mailto:twg-bounces at lists.opensfs.org] On Behalf Of Hamilton, Pam Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 8:31 PM To: Execs at lists.opensfs.org; twg at lists.opensfs.org; rpwg at lists.opensfs.org; swg at lists.opensfs.org; comswg at lists.opensfs.org Subject: [Twg] OpenSFS Support Working Group draft white paper - Round 2 Hi all, Attached is another draft of the OpenSFS Support Working Group white paper. During support model discussions, the SWG felt we were lacking a good understanding of the high level requirements for OpenSFS and any release distributed by the organization. Without this understanding, we are struggling with developing the support model. Therefore, this draft of includes a section with what we see as high level requirements for OpenSFS. I'm sending to the execs and other working groups to get a discussion started and hopefully we can reach a consensus regarding the requirements. Regards, Pam ___________________________________ Pam Hamilton Lawrence Livermore National Lab P.O. Box 808, L-556 Livermore, CA 94551-9900 E-Mail: pgh at llnl.gov Phone: 925-423-1332 Fax: 925-423-8719 ___________________________________ _______________________________________________ swg mailing list swg at lists.opensfs.org http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/swg-opensfs.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 81515 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 8719 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: From hamilton5 at llnl.gov Tue Dec 7 20:00:00 2010 From: hamilton5 at llnl.gov (Hamilton, Pam) Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 12:00:00 -0800 Subject: [Comswg] [Swg] OpenSFS Support Working Group draft white paper - Round 2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi John, The issues you raise regarding support for the different Lustre versions are valid. Our working group has not had specific discussions related to which versions will be supported or not. We are still trying to get our heads around what are the high level requirements we are trying to meet. I will make a note that we must address which Lustre versions are supported. Regards, Pam ___________________________________ Pam Hamilton Lawrence Livermore National Lab P.O. Box 808, L-556 Livermore, CA 94551-9900 E-Mail: pgh at llnl.gov Phone: 925-423-1332 Fax: 925-423-8719 ___________________________________ From: John Carrier [mailto:carrier at cray.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 10:49 AM To: Hamilton, Pam Cc: Dan Ferber; twg at lists.opensfs.org; swg at lists.opensfs.org; rpwg at lists.opensfs.org; comswg at lists.opensfs.org; Execs at lists.opensfs.org Subject: RE: [Swg] OpenSFS Support Working Group draft white paper - Round 2 Pam, Dan raises a good point. If we're talking Lustre 2.x, then servers will only run on RHEL and its derivatives. But many of us are running Lustre 1.8.x on SLES and do not have the option of moving to RHEL without changing the hardware platform on which the servers are running. Is the support working group considering support for Lustre 1.8.x? Thanks, --jc From: Dan Ferber [mailto:dferber at whamcloud.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 9:56 AM To: John Carrier; Hamilton, Pam Subject: Re: [Swg] OpenSFS Support Working Group draft white paper - Round 2 I agree SLES (and RH) need to be added for clients. I know Oracle's support policy (for their current but not new customers and partners - and for 1.8 and not 2.0) is online, and here is Whamcloud's support plans, just as another datapoint: http://wiki.whamcloud.com/display/PUB/Support+Matrix [cid:image001.png at 01CB9605.BC3EDB70] Dan [cid:image002.png at 01CB9605.BC3EDB70] Dan Ferber Customer Service and Business Development Manager Office: +1 651-344-1846 Cell: +1 651-344-1846 Email: dferber at whamcloud.com From: John Carrier > Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 11:46:06 -0600 To: "Hamilton, Pam" > Cc: "comswg at lists.opensfs.org" >, "Execs at lists.opensfs.org" >, "swg at lists.opensfs.org" >, "twg at lists.opensfs.org" >, "rpwg at lists.opensfs.org" > Subject: Re: [Swg] OpenSFS Support Working Group draft white paper - Round 2 Hi Pam, Your description of release mentions Redhat only. I think this is appropriate for the servers, but many members are using other distributions on their cluster nodes. What are the support plans for the Lustre clients for the OpenSFS distribution? Oracle has stated that their Linux support is for OEL and other RHEL derivatives. Clients will continue to be supported on all current distributions (SLES, RHEL, etc). Thanks, --jc From: twg-bounces at lists.opensfs.org [mailto:twg-bounces at lists.opensfs.org] On Behalf Of Hamilton, Pam Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 8:31 PM To: Execs at lists.opensfs.org; twg at lists.opensfs.org; rpwg at lists.opensfs.org; swg at lists.opensfs.org; comswg at lists.opensfs.org Subject: [Twg] OpenSFS Support Working Group draft white paper - Round 2 Hi all, Attached is another draft of the OpenSFS Support Working Group white paper. During support model discussions, the SWG felt we were lacking a good understanding of the high level requirements for OpenSFS and any release distributed by the organization. Without this understanding, we are struggling with developing the support model. Therefore, this draft of includes a section with what we see as high level requirements for OpenSFS. I'm sending to the execs and other working groups to get a discussion started and hopefully we can reach a consensus regarding the requirements. Regards, Pam ___________________________________ Pam Hamilton Lawrence Livermore National Lab P.O. Box 808, L-556 Livermore, CA 94551-9900 E-Mail: pgh at llnl.gov Phone: 925-423-1332 Fax: 925-423-8719 ___________________________________ _______________________________________________ swg mailing list swg at lists.opensfs.org http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/swg-opensfs.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 81515 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 8719 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: From seager1 at llnl.gov Wed Dec 8 17:22:57 2010 From: seager1 at llnl.gov (Seager, Mark K.) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 09:22:57 -0800 Subject: [Comswg] FW: OpenSFS color options Message-ID: <6DAF24F9BB747E47A4BAE7A6F5B80C7DF5825BD669@NSPEXMBX-A.the-lab.llnl.gov> FYI. ++Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: execs-bounces at lists.opensfs.org [mailto:execs- > bounces at lists.opensfs.org] On Behalf Of Shipman, Galen M. > Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 8:51 AM > To: Open SFS SFS > Subject: [Execs] OpenSFS color options > > See anything you like? > > Thanks, > > Galen > > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: openSFS-logo-options.png Type: image/png Size: 110314 bytes Desc: openSFS-logo-options.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ Execs mailing list Execs at lists.opensfs.org http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/execs-opensfs.org From ssseager at gmail.com Wed Dec 8 17:23:11 2010 From: ssseager at gmail.com (Shay Seager) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 12:23:11 -0500 Subject: [Comswg] Fwd: proposal for colors/font for website References: <52DC17C8-4203-433F-91A5-28A375EE8189@gmail.com> Message-ID: Begin forwarded message: > From: Shay Seager > Date: December 7, 2010 10:59:29 AM EST > To: Norman Morse , OpenSFSBoard > Subject: proposal for colors/font for website > > for board meeting today -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: colors:fonts for opensfs website.doc Type: application/msword Size: 41984 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gshipman at ornl.gov Wed Dec 8 17:26:13 2010 From: gshipman at ornl.gov (Shipman, Galen M.) Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:26:13 -0500 Subject: [Comswg] Logos with color Message-ID: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: openSFS-logo-options.png Type: image/png Size: 110314 bytes Desc: openSFS-logo-options.png URL: From ryan at ddn.com Wed Dec 8 23:07:02 2010 From: ryan at ddn.com (Ryan Weiss) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:07:02 -0800 Subject: [Comswg] FW: OpenSFS color options In-Reply-To: <6DAF24F9BB747E47A4BAE7A6F5B80C7DF5825BD669@NSPEXMBX-A.the-lab.llnl.gov> References: <6DAF24F9BB747E47A4BAE7A6F5B80C7DF5825BD669@NSPEXMBX-A.the-lab.llnl.gov> Message-ID: <4D000F96.4000206@ddn.com> Sorry I missed the call today - meeting conflict. FWIW I prefer 3 followed by 4, followed by 5/7/6. For any of 5-8, I think I would prefer the text in the foreground (eg loops not printing over the text). Sincerely, Ryan On 12/08/2010 09:22 AM, Seager, Mark K. wrote: > FYI. ++Mark > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: execs-bounces at lists.opensfs.org [mailto:execs- >> bounces at lists.opensfs.org] On Behalf Of Shipman, Galen M. >> Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 8:51 AM >> To: Open SFS SFS >> Subject: [Execs] OpenSFS color options >> >> See anything you like? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Galen >> >> >> -- Ryan Weiss 925-369-2589 DataDirect Networks http://www.ddn.com/ From jay at schwerno.com Thu Dec 9 16:48:48 2010 From: jay at schwerno.com (Jay Schwerin) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 08:48:48 -0800 Subject: [Comswg] MarCom/Brand discussion points Message-ID: Hi All, Here are some thoughts/questions on some of the current marcom/brand issues. Hopefully this helps the conversation along. Jay Color Choice I apologize this has bee more complicated than it should be. Looking at palettes might be causing unneccessary confusion. The goal should probably be to determine what color is OpenSFS? (e.g. IBM is blue, Oracle is red, Symantec is yellow). Recommendation: Shay and I should pick three colors and send out for discussion. Draft Wiki Do we think this has all the features needed? https://sites.google.com/site/opensfsdraftwiki/ Site Changes for OpenSFS.org Thoughts on quick fixes to the site that seem like they could improve the appearance immediately: Limit Top Nav Bar to only a few high level options, keeping it to one line. e.g. > Home > Organization > Participation (maybe shorten to "Join") > Groups > News > Resources - Re-org the right hand column and add links in these sections. - Add company logos in an animated gif or flash item on Home or Participation page. - Sprinkle some of the tradeshow graphics around the site. Each of these tasks can be done in short order, if the look still isn't professional enough we can look into updating the template or a complete site redesign. -- Jay Schwerin 650-440-0522 jay at schwerno.com From ssseager at gmail.com Thu Dec 9 17:22:25 2010 From: ssseager at gmail.com (Shay Seager) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:22:25 -0500 Subject: [Comswg] MarCom/Brand discussion points In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3FF92591-EC6F-4D5F-B794-F640D1AA01FD@gmail.com> I like the wiki - I think it is really user friendly and has all the features we need - but it would be good to get feedback from the working group leads so we know what their requirements are for their pages. I think the most responses we got on the call were for green - now we just need to decide what shade so let's send out 3 green shades and get a vote back on that. Action items for the group: -working group leads - send in requirements for group wiki page -Board vote on what shade of green we will use for the logo On Dec 9, 2010, at 11:48 AM, Jay Schwerin wrote: > Hi All, > > Here are some thoughts/questions on some of the current marcom/brand > issues. Hopefully this helps the conversation along. > > Jay > > > Color Choice > I apologize this has bee more complicated than it should be. Looking > at palettes might be causing unneccessary confusion. The goal should > probably be to determine what color is OpenSFS? (e.g. IBM is blue, > Oracle is red, Symantec is yellow). Recommendation: Shay and I should > pick three colors and send out for discussion. > > > Draft Wiki > Do we think this has all the features needed? > https://sites.google.com/site/opensfsdraftwiki/ > > > Site Changes for OpenSFS.org > > Thoughts on quick fixes to the site that seem like they could improve > the appearance immediately: > > Limit Top Nav Bar to only a few high level options, keeping it to one line. e.g. > >> Home >> Organization >> Participation (maybe shorten to "Join") >> Groups >> News >> Resources > > - Re-org the right hand column and add links in these sections. > - Add company logos in an animated gif or flash item on Home or > Participation page. > - Sprinkle some of the tradeshow graphics around the site. > > Each of these tasks can be done in short order, if the look still > isn't professional enough we can look into updating the template or a > complete site redesign. > > > > -- > Jay Schwerin > 650-440-0522 > jay at schwerno.com > _______________________________________________ > comswg mailing list > comswg at lists.opensfs.org > http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/comswg-opensfs.org From seager1 at llnl.gov Wed Dec 15 17:22:12 2010 From: seager1 at llnl.gov (Seager, Mark K.) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 09:22:12 -0800 Subject: [Comswg] Pictures for Web Site Message-ID: <6DAF24F9BB747E47A4BAE7A6F5B80C7DFB74E55BDE@NSPEXMBX-A.the-lab.llnl.gov> We need some pictures to spruce up the OpenSFS.org web site. In particular, it would be good to get some "generic" shots of rows of disks/servers and also headshots of the board and WG leads to add to the web pages listing those names. Can you please send your input to Jay. Thanx, ++Mark ________________________________ Mark K. Seager Advanced Technology| Google Voice LLNL | The more original a discovery, the more 925-456-4214 POBOX 808, L-554 | obvious it seems afterwards. seager [at] 7000 East Ave. | -- Arthur Koestler llnl.gov Livermore, CA 94551| ________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jay at schwerno.com Wed Dec 15 21:03:45 2010 From: jay at schwerno.com (Jay Schwerin) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:03:45 -0800 Subject: [Comswg] Colors, applied to site design, draft 1 Message-ID: Hi All, Here's a first attempt at showing the impact of a few different colors on the current site design, along with a larger logo in that color. We're hoping you can vote for your preference. Please respond by the end of Thursday, if possible. Hopefully everyone can open ppt files. Let me know if changes are needed. The colors are three from the suggested options by Shay. The mockups shown aren't necessarily how they will end up looking in this site design.. we could always darken/lighten as needed. Jay -- Jay Schwerin 650-440-0522 jay at schwerno.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: opensfs_color.pptx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation Size: 1641277 bytes Desc: not available URL: From hamilton5 at llnl.gov Thu Dec 16 00:25:48 2010 From: hamilton5 at llnl.gov (Hamilton, Pam) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:25:48 -0800 Subject: [Comswg] Colors, applied to site design, draft 1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: My vote is the green. Although, I'd like to see the larger logo in a darker shade. -Pam ___________________________________ Pam Hamilton Lawrence Livermore National Lab P.O. Box 808, L-556 Livermore, CA  94551-9900 E-Mail:  pgh at llnl.gov Phone:  925-423-1332          Fax:  925-423-8719 ___________________________________ > -----Original Message----- > From: comswg-bounces at lists.opensfs.org [mailto:comswg- > bounces at lists.opensfs.org] On Behalf Of Jay Schwerin > Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 1:04 PM > To: comswg at lists.opensfs.org > Subject: [Comswg] Colors, applied to site design, draft 1 > > Hi All, > > Here's a first attempt at showing the impact of a few different colors > on the current site design, along with a larger logo in that color. > > We're hoping you can vote for your preference. Please respond by the > end of Thursday, if possible. > > Hopefully everyone can open ppt files. > > Let me know if changes are needed. The colors are three from the > suggested options by Shay. The mockups shown aren't necessarily how > they will end up looking in this site design.. we could always > darken/lighten as needed. > > Jay > > -- > Jay Schwerin > 650-440-0522 > jay at schwerno.com From seager1 at llnl.gov Thu Dec 16 01:33:19 2010 From: seager1 at llnl.gov (Seager, Mark K.) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:33:19 -0800 Subject: [Comswg] Colors, applied to site design, draft 1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <6DAF24F9BB747E47A4BAE7A6F5B80C7DFB74E55DC2@NSPEXMBX-A.the-lab.llnl.gov> I like the green as well, but it is too dark. Can we try a lighter shade of green. Also, I really like the Logo with a rainbow colored hailo Regards, ++Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: comswg-bounces at lists.opensfs.org [mailto:comswg- > bounces at lists.opensfs.org] On Behalf Of Hamilton, Pam > Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 4:26 PM > To: Jay Schwerin; comswg at lists.opensfs.org > Subject: Re: [Comswg] Colors, applied to site design, draft 1 > > My vote is the green. Although, I'd like to see the larger logo in a > darker shade. > > -Pam > > ___________________________________ > Pam Hamilton > Lawrence Livermore National Lab > P.O. Box 808, L-556 > Livermore, CA  94551-9900 > E-Mail:  pgh at llnl.gov > Phone:  925-423-1332          Fax:  925-423-8719 > ___________________________________ > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: comswg-bounces at lists.opensfs.org [mailto:comswg- > > bounces at lists.opensfs.org] On Behalf Of Jay Schwerin > > Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 1:04 PM > > To: comswg at lists.opensfs.org > > Subject: [Comswg] Colors, applied to site design, draft 1 > > > > Hi All, > > > > Here's a first attempt at showing the impact of a few different > colors > > on the current site design, along with a larger logo in that color. > > > > We're hoping you can vote for your preference. Please respond by the > > end of Thursday, if possible. > > > > Hopefully everyone can open ppt files. > > > > Let me know if changes are needed. The colors are three from the > > suggested options by Shay. The mockups shown aren't necessarily how > > they will end up looking in this site design.. we could always > > darken/lighten as needed. > > > > Jay > > > > -- > > Jay Schwerin > > 650-440-0522 > > jay at schwerno.com > _______________________________________________ > comswg mailing list > comswg at lists.opensfs.org > http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/comswg-opensfs.org From seager1 at llnl.gov Thu Dec 16 01:40:56 2010 From: seager1 at llnl.gov (Seager, Mark K.) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:40:56 -0800 Subject: [Comswg] X-Fertilization Mailing List Request Message-ID: <6DAF24F9BB747E47A4BAE7A6F5B80C7DFB74E55DCF@NSPEXMBX-A.the-lab.llnl.gov> I talked with Matt Leininger and we don't know how to use the mailer interface to set up a X-fertilization mailing list. We don't think that Pam's idea of a list of lists can be made to work because we would have to allow anyone to post to the list and we don't want to do that, do we? If someone can figure out how to do it and tell Matt how to do it, he would be happy to set it up. Regards, ++Mark ________________________________ Mark K. Seager Advanced Technology| Google Voice LLNL | The more original a discovery, the more 925-456-4214 POBOX 808, L-554 | obvious it seems afterwards. seager [at] 7000 East Ave. | -- Arthur Koestler llnl.gov Livermore, CA 94551| ________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ssseager at gmail.com Thu Dec 16 18:07:48 2010 From: ssseager at gmail.com (Shay Seager) Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:07:48 -0800 Subject: [Comswg] Colors, applied to site design, draft 1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I really like the top - aqua marine color. I agree that we should lighten the header I like this proposal - the format is very good - I think we can just submit this to the board. On Dec 15, 2010, at 1:03 PM, Jay Schwerin wrote: > Hi All, > > Here's a first attempt at showing the impact of a few different colors > on the current site design, along with a larger logo in that color. > > We're hoping you can vote for your preference. Please respond by the > end of Thursday, if possible. > > Hopefully everyone can open ppt files. > > Let me know if changes are needed. The colors are three from the > suggested options by Shay. The mockups shown aren't necessarily how > they will end up looking in this site design.. we could always > darken/lighten as needed. > > Jay > > -- > Jay Schwerin > 650-440-0522 > jay at schwerno.com > _______________________________________________ > comswg mailing list > comswg at lists.opensfs.org > http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/comswg-opensfs.org From jay at schwerno.com Fri Dec 17 18:43:59 2010 From: jay at schwerno.com (Jay Schwerin) Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:43:59 -0800 Subject: [Comswg] Colors, applied to site design, draft 1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Again, Here's a revised PPT. Based on a chat with Shay, the top color option was lightened some. Let me know if other varieties/changes are needed. Thanks. Jay On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Jay Schwerin wrote: > Hi All, > > Here's a first attempt at showing the impact of a few different colors > on the current site design, along with a larger logo in that color. > > We're hoping you can vote for your preference. Please respond by the > end of Thursday, if possible. > > Hopefully everyone can open ppt files. > > Let me know if changes are needed. The colors are three from the > suggested options by Shay. The mockups shown aren't necessarily how > they will end up looking in this site design.. we could always > darken/lighten as needed. > > Jay > > -- > Jay Schwerin > 650-440-0522 > jay at schwerno.com > -- Jay Schwerin 650-440-0522 jay at schwerno.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: opensfs_color2.pptx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation Size: 1643703 bytes Desc: not available URL: From blaiseb at llnl.gov Fri Dec 17 19:06:40 2010 From: blaiseb at llnl.gov (Blaise M. Barney) Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:06:40 -0800 Subject: [Comswg] Colors, applied to site design, draft 1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4D0BB4C0.8030006@llnl.gov> These look great - colorful but not overdone, professional and clean. The top teal colored one gets my vote, but honestly, any of the three choices would do nicely. -Blaise On 12/17/2010 10:43 AM, Jay Schwerin wrote: > Hi Again, > > Here's a revised PPT. Based on a chat with Shay, the top color option > was lightened some. Let me know if other varieties/changes are needed. > Thanks. > > Jay > > > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Jay Schwerin wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Here's a first attempt at showing the impact of a few different colors >> on the current site design, along with a larger logo in that color. >> >> We're hoping you can vote for your preference. Please respond by the >> end of Thursday, if possible. >> >> Hopefully everyone can open ppt files. >> >> Let me know if changes are needed. The colors are three from the >> suggested options by Shay. The mockups shown aren't necessarily how >> they will end up looking in this site design.. we could always >> darken/lighten as needed. >> >> Jay >> >> -- >> Jay Schwerin >> 650-440-0522 >> jay at schwerno.com >> > > -- _____________________________________________________________________ Blaise M. Barney blaiseb at llnl.gov Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 925-422-2578 7000 East Ave. L-557 925-423-6961 (fax) Livermore, CA 94550 computing.llnl.gov _____________________________________________________________________ From ssseager at gmail.com Sat Dec 18 20:46:41 2010 From: ssseager at gmail.com (Shay Seager) Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 12:46:41 -0800 Subject: [Comswg] Colors, applied to site design, draft 1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I like it! Any comments? Can we submit this to the board mailing list? Thanks! Shay On Dec 17, 2010, at 10:43 AM, Jay Schwerin wrote: > Hi Again, > > Here's a revised PPT. Based on a chat with Shay, the top color option > was lightened some. Let me know if other varieties/changes are needed. > Thanks. > > Jay > > > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Jay Schwerin wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Here's a first attempt at showing the impact of a few different colors >> on the current site design, along with a larger logo in that color. >> >> We're hoping you can vote for your preference. Please respond by the >> end of Thursday, if possible. >> >> Hopefully everyone can open ppt files. >> >> Let me know if changes are needed. The colors are three from the >> suggested options by Shay. The mockups shown aren't necessarily how >> they will end up looking in this site design.. we could always >> darken/lighten as needed. >> >> Jay >> >> -- >> Jay Schwerin >> 650-440-0522 >> jay at schwerno.com >> > > > > -- > Jay Schwerin > 650-440-0522 > jay at schwerno.com > _______________________________________________ > comswg mailing list > comswg at lists.opensfs.org > http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/comswg-opensfs.org From gshipman at ornl.gov Mon Dec 20 14:45:19 2010 From: gshipman at ornl.gov (Shipman, Galen M.) Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:45:19 -0500 Subject: [Comswg] Colors, applied to site design, draft 1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I prefer the 1st and 3rd option - Galen On Dec 17, 2010, at 1:43 PM, Jay Schwerin wrote: > Hi Again, > > Here's a revised PPT. Based on a chat with Shay, the top color option > was lightened some. Let me know if other varieties/changes are needed. > Thanks. > > Jay > > > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Jay Schwerin wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Here's a first attempt at showing the impact of a few different colors >> on the current site design, along with a larger logo in that color. >> >> We're hoping you can vote for your preference. Please respond by the >> end of Thursday, if possible. >> >> Hopefully everyone can open ppt files. >> >> Let me know if changes are needed. The colors are three from the >> suggested options by Shay. The mockups shown aren't necessarily how >> they will end up looking in this site design.. we could always >> darken/lighten as needed. >> >> Jay >> >> -- >> Jay Schwerin >> 650-440-0522 >> jay at schwerno.com >> > > > > -- > Jay Schwerin > 650-440-0522 > jay at schwerno.com > _______________________________________________ > comswg mailing list > comswg at lists.opensfs.org > http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/comswg-opensfs.org From seager1 at llnl.gov Mon Dec 20 19:53:57 2010 From: seager1 at llnl.gov (Seager, Mark K.) Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:53:57 -0800 Subject: [Comswg] Canceled: OpenSFS Communications WG Telecon Message-ID: <6DAF24F9BB747E47A4BAE7A6F5B80C7DFB74E56335@NSPEXMBX-A.the-lab.llnl.gov> When: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 9:00 AM-10:00 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada). Where: 866-914-3976 (925-424-8105)x463496# Note: The GMT offset above does not reflect daylight saving time adjustments. *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* This week’s comswg meeting is canceled… Have a great Christmas! Regards, ++Mark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 2188 bytes Desc: not available URL: From seager1 at llnl.gov Mon Dec 20 19:54:47 2010 From: seager1 at llnl.gov (Seager, Mark K.) Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:54:47 -0800 Subject: [Comswg] Canceled: OpenSFS Communications WG Telecon Message-ID: <6DAF24F9BB747E47A4BAE7A6F5B80C7DFB74E56336@NSPEXMBX-A.the-lab.llnl.gov> When: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 9:00 AM-10:00 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada). Where: 866-914-3976 (925-424-8105)x463496# Note: The GMT offset above does not reflect daylight saving time adjustments. *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Comswg meeting between Christmas and new years is canceled. Have a great NEW YEARS! Regards, ++Mark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 2206 bytes Desc: not available URL: From seager1 at llnl.gov Mon Dec 20 19:56:02 2010 From: seager1 at llnl.gov (Seager, Mark K.) Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:56:02 -0800 Subject: [Comswg] OpenSFS Working Group Cross Fertalization Telecon Message-ID: <6DAF24F9BB747E47A4BAE7A6F5B80C7DFB74E56337@NSPEXMBX-A.the-lab.llnl.gov> When: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 9:00 AM-10:00 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada). Where: 517-308-1709x5282795 Note: The GMT offset above does not reflect daylight saving time adjustments. *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* The working group cross fertilization telecon between Christmas and New Years holiday is hereby canceled. Have a great Holliday! Regards, ++Mark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 3446 bytes Desc: not available URL: