[lustre-devel] FW: [Lwg] 11/4 Teleconference notes

[Cory Spitz]

Hello, Lustre developers.

On today¹s OpenSFS LWG teleconference call (notes at
http://wiki.opensfs.org/LWG_Minutes_2015-11-04) I proposed that we change
the Lustre release cadence from six months to nine months.  Chris M.
responded (below) that any discussion about development changes should
happen here on lustre-devel.  I agree, developers need to be on-board.

So what do you think about release changes?  What requirements do you
have?  What issues would you have if OpenSFS changed the major release
cadence to nine months?

Thanks,

-Cory

On 11/4/15, 1:58 PM, "lwg on behalf of Christopher J. Morrone"
<lwg-bounces at lists.opensfs.org on behalf of morrone2 at llnl.gov> wrote:

>On 11/04/2015 10:28 AM, Cory Spitz wrote:
>
>> Lustre release cadence
>> We haven¹t been good about hitting our 6 month schedules
>> Cory proposed a 9 month cadence just to recognize reality.  Certainly
>> pros/cons to any scheme.  Should be up for discussion.  How/when to
>>decide?
>
>Any development change like that needs to be discussed on lustre-devel.
>
>Chris
>
>_______________________________________________
>lwg mailing list
>lwg at lists.opensfs.org
>http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/lwg-opensfs.org