[Twg] [Discuss] TWG development requirements voting
Andreas Dilger
adilger at whamcloud.com
Thu May 17 16:24:03 UTC 2012
On 2012-05-17, at 8:00 AM, Cory Spitz wrote:
>> Voting is really just a matter of submitting to discuss at lists.opensfs.org a prioritized list of top10 features from our gathered requirements http://goo.gl/cZSWG.
>
> That link points to last year's requirements. Please go to
> http://goo.gl/63u9Q for this year's requirements.
Will there be a call this week, or are we waiting on priority lists?
> On 05/17/2012 06:54 AM, John Carrier wrote:
>> We still need your help identifying the top requirements, which the TWG
>> will propose that OpenSFS fund for 2013. Our goal is to issue an RFP
>> and complete contract negotiations by SC12. All organizations in the
>> Lustre community are welcome to submit a list.
>>
>>
>>
>> I’ve received priority lists from the following organizations: Fermi,
>> IU, CEA, Bull, Whamcloud, Terascala, and LLNL.
>>
>> Please let me know ASAP if you submitted a list and are not mentioned
>> above.
>>
>>
>>
>> Dave and I had hoped that we would wrap up voting before this week’s TWG
>> call. But at this point, I don’t have lists from 4 of the 5 OpenSFS
>> promoters (Cray, DDN, ORNL, Xyratex). Therefore, I propose that we
>> wrap up the voting this week so that I can publish the tally next week
>> for discussion at our 5/24 meeting. Here’s the “new” schedule:
>>
>> Fri 5/18 – final deadline to submit top 10 requirments in priority order
>>
>> Mon 5/21 – TWG to publish summary of votes
>>
>> Thur 5/24 – TWG meeting to resolve summary and make recommendation to board
>>
>>
>>
>> Voting is really just a matter of submitting to
>> discuss at lists.opensfs.org <mailto:discuss at lists.opensfs.org> a
>> prioritized list of top10 features from our gathered requirements
>> http://goo.gl/cZSWG. Although we will include all lists in our
>> analysis, voting priority will be given to OpenSFS members to resolve
>> ties. The OpenSFS board has ultimate authority for recommending which
>> features should be funded for development.
>>
>>
>>
>> Please let us know if you have any questions.
>>
>>
>>
>> John & Dave
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> discuss mailing list
>> discuss at lists.opensfs.org
>> http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/discuss-opensfs.org
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at lists.opensfs.org
> http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/discuss-opensfs.org
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger Whamcloud, Inc.
Principal Lustre Engineer http://www.whamcloud.com/
More information about the Twg
mailing list