[cdwg] Monitoring Ticket Progress

[John Forgan]

Hi,

With so much happening with Lustre and the nature of Open Source
participation in general it can be pretty tricky to keep track of ticket
states and, in particular, defects. Different organisations will possibly
have different priorities and it is difficult for the Gatekeepers and other
monitors to determine relative priorities.

With that in mind, I'm wondering if it might be useful to track those
tickets that seem to have stalled. For example, fixes that have not been
reviewed, or that have been reviewed but not landed and that haven't had
any activity for say a month.

A couple of filters that we've looked at that might be used are:

*Not Completed Review*:

http://review.whamcloud.com/#/q/status:open+age:1mon+Verified%252B1+CodeReview%252B2+-Verified-1+-CodeReview-1+-CodeReview-2,n,z

*Reviewed, but not landed*:

http://review.whamcloud.com/#/q/status:open+age:1mon+Verified%252B1+-Verified-1+-CodeReview-1+-CodeReview-2,n,z


Perhaps the results of these, or similar, filters could be embedded in the
CDWG Wiki page and could be discussed at the CDWG meetings?


To highlight individual priorities we could also ask participants to
provide notice to the CDWG of "troublesome" tickets prior to the CDWG
meeting where they could then be discussed.

I'd be keen to hear your thoughts and perhaps we can discuss the proposal
at the next call?

Best regards

John

-- 

John Forgan
Senior Software Engineering Manager
Xyratex
Office : +44 (0)2392 496819
Mobile: +44 (0)7738 136207
*john_forgan at xyratex.com
*www.xyratex.com

-- 


------------------------------
For additional information including the registered office and the treatment of Xyratex confidential information please visit www.xyratex.com

------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensfs.org/pipermail/cdwg-opensfs.org/attachments/20130725/87725371/attachment.htm>