[cdwg] Lustre 2.6 Test Plan_Draft

[Jones, Peter A]

Chris

As per the discussion on this week's call. Let's use the label cdwgbl to
mark issues that we think should be addressed in an upcoming release prior
to scoping and resource allocation.

Regards

Peter

On 10/22/13 5:23 PM, "Christopher J. Morrone" <morrone2 at llnl.gov> wrote:

>Jodi,
>
>I think we really need to close the gap between the 7 tickets listed in
>this scope statement and the 63 initial tickets targetting Lustre 2.6.0
>in Jira.  That is just too much of a disparity.
>
>I imagine that closing the gap will involve both removing the 2.6.0 Fix
>Version from some tickets and adding more work items to the scope
>document.
>
>I would also like to see something in the scope statement that covers
>documentation for the release.
>
>Chris
>
>On 10/18/2013 01:54 PM, Levi, Jodi wrote:
>> I have attached the first draft of the Lustre 2.6 Release test plan. I
>>am also attaching the latest version of the 2.6 Scope Statement with the
>>updates from our last call.
>> Please let me know if you have any questions.
>> Thank you!
>> -Jodi
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdwg mailing list
>> cdwg at lists.opensfs.org
>> http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/cdwg-opensfs.org
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>cdwg mailing list
>cdwg at lists.opensfs.org
>http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/cdwg-opensfs.org