[cdwg] OpenSFS CDWG Call

[Cory Spitz]

Peter, I think that it looks fine.  Maybe one other suggestion might be to
add "In-tree vanilla kernel (client)" as an option in addition to 'Other
(please specify)'.  Either way, I think we'll get the info we want.

-Cory

On 1/29/14, 11:47 AM, "Jones, Peter A" <peter.a.jones at intel.com> wrote:

>Here¹s the draft I mentioned on the call -
>https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/P3HFY7R
>
>Cory, I tried to incorporate your feedback about the upstream Lustre
>client in question 3 but it was only possible to add one option with free
>text. Do you think that this wording is sufficiently clear?
>
>On 1/28/14, 7:33 PM, "Morrone, Chris"
><morrone2 at llnl.gov<mailto:morrone2 at llnl.gov>> wrote:
>
>
>Hi all,
>
>This is a reminder that we will have a Community Development Working
>Group (CDWG) call on Wednesday, January 29, at 9:00am PDT.
>
>Agenda:
>
>* Lustre 2.6 Development Update
>* Open Discussion
>
>Call-in: 866-914-3976 (925-424-8105) Passcode: 534986#
>
>Regards,
>Chris
>
>_______________________________________________
>cdwg mailing list
>cdwg at lists.opensfs.org
>http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/cdwg-opensfs.org