[Twg] draft whitepaper

[Kit Westneat]

Hi John,

The support wg white paper mentions providing the twg with support 
metrics in order to help plan the evolution of OpenSFS, but the twg 
white paper currently doesn't discuss how support issues might affect 
the twg planning. Is this understood as part of surveying the OpenSFS 
membership?

If the OpenSFS members decide to invest in a project to improve the 
reliability of Lustre, or even a subsystem of Lustre like quotas, would 
this be done through the twg or swg?

Thanks,
Kit

On 12/07/2010 12:50 PM, John Carrier wrote:
> Team,
>
> Please take a look at the one-page whitepaper I sent last week.  I have received just one comment so far.  What did I miss?  What did I get wrong?
>
> The board expects the TWG to complete this task ASAP.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --jc
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: twg-bounces at lists.opensfs.org [mailto:twg-bounces at lists.opensfs.org] On Behalf Of John Carrier
> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 11:48 PM
> To: twg at lists.opensfs.org
> Subject: [Twg] draft whitepaper
>
> Attached is a draft whitepaper describing the function of the TWG.  This is based on our one meeting at SC two weeks ago, so I fully expect it to change as more people get involved.  Please feel free to add or edit the text.  If there is time, I hope we can discuss the doc during the 12/2 call.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --jc
> _______________________________________________
> twg mailing list
> twg at lists.opensfs.org
> http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/twg-opensfs.org


-- 
---
Kit Westneat
812-484-8485