[Twg] draft whitepaper
John Carrier
carrier at cray.com
Tue Dec 7 18:44:32 UTC 2010
Hi Kit,
Good question. All development projects are to be run through the twg. This would include features to improve reliability or administration.
I think the inputs into the roadmap and project stack from the support and release working groups would come about through our survey of the OpenSFS membership.
Anyone else with an opinion?
I think we also need to understand the hand-off of development features with these other groups. We discussed at SC the need for preparing release collateral and passing this all to Oracle. But should this be done through the release team?
Thanks,
--jc
-----Original Message-----
From: twg-bounces at lists.opensfs.org [mailto:twg-bounces at lists.opensfs.org] On Behalf Of Kit Westneat
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 10:31 AM
To: twg at lists.opensfs.org
Subject: Re: [Twg] draft whitepaper
Hi John,
The support wg white paper mentions providing the twg with support
metrics in order to help plan the evolution of OpenSFS, but the twg
white paper currently doesn't discuss how support issues might affect
the twg planning. Is this understood as part of surveying the OpenSFS
membership?
If the OpenSFS members decide to invest in a project to improve the
reliability of Lustre, or even a subsystem of Lustre like quotas, would
this be done through the twg or swg?
Thanks,
Kit
On 12/07/2010 12:50 PM, John Carrier wrote:
> Team,
>
> Please take a look at the one-page whitepaper I sent last week. I have received just one comment so far. What did I miss? What did I get wrong?
>
> The board expects the TWG to complete this task ASAP.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --jc
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: twg-bounces at lists.opensfs.org [mailto:twg-bounces at lists.opensfs.org] On Behalf Of John Carrier
> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 11:48 PM
> To: twg at lists.opensfs.org
> Subject: [Twg] draft whitepaper
>
> Attached is a draft whitepaper describing the function of the TWG. This is based on our one meeting at SC two weeks ago, so I fully expect it to change as more people get involved. Please feel free to add or edit the text. If there is time, I hope we can discuss the doc during the 12/2 call.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --jc
> _______________________________________________
> twg mailing list
> twg at lists.opensfs.org
> http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/twg-opensfs.org
--
---
Kit Westneat
812-484-8485
_______________________________________________
twg mailing list
twg at lists.opensfs.org
http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/twg-opensfs.org
More information about the Twg
mailing list