[Twg] meeting minutes for 2011-03-17

[John Carrier]

Thanks, Andreas.  Your suggestion for modifying the table was exactly what I had in mind.

--jc

-----Original Message-----
From: Andreas Dilger [mailto:adilger at whamcloud.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 12:26 PM
To: John Carrier
Cc: twg at lists.opensfs.org
Subject: Re: [Twg] meeting minutes for 2011-03-17

On 2011-03-17, at 1:21 PM, John Carrier wrote:
> In record time, here are the minutes from today's TWG meeting.  We reviewed the draft requirements document I sent to the reflector earlier this morning.  The document includes our recommendations to the OpenSFS board.  
> 
> Dave and I ask all TWG members to read the document and provide us with your edits, comments, etc by the close of business this Monday, 3/21.  We will submit the final document to the board on Tuesday.  We want to be certain that we have captured all of the requirements that we discussed over the last couple months and have correctly presented the TWG's priorities.  

John,
for your reference, the published limits of Lustre 2.0 are at: http://wiki.lustre.org/manual/LustreManual20_HTML/SettingUpLustreSystem.html#50438256_84701

I don't think the limits are different between 1.8 and 2.0, just that the table in the 2.0 manual was updated more recently.

It might make sense to structure the "filesystem limits" data in your submission to the board as a table with "current", "2012", and "2014" columns.

> If you have different opinions on the requirements or our priorities, then please initiate a discussion of the topic on the TWG reflector.


Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger 
Principal Engineer
Whamcloud, Inc.