[Twg] [Discuss] FW: OpenSFS TWG Requi... - Have we achieved the single-server MD...

[Nathan Rutman]

pdirops was delivered, but the improvement results were somewhat disappointing.  I've seen no metrics for various directory listing improvements, although they may exist.
Should we set a target rate? E.g. "ls -al" for a dir with 100K single-stripe files?


On Apr 30, 2012, at 11:53 AM, John Carrier wrote:


	
	Nathan adds a good question:  metadata performance was the focus of our last RFP.  Are there any performance targets not covered by our current development contract?
	 
	--jc
	 
	Nathan Rutman added a comment to OpenSFS TWG Requirements 2012 <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gXs0VPaCNEU3l9OuXYmBCyxKEm3dkIV60smCVAD5Un8/edit?disco=AAAAAEv8ZFI> 
Nathan Rutman
Metadata server performance
Have we achieved the single-server MDS performance goals? Do we need to move some more solid requirements to 2012?
	 
	_______________________________________________
	discuss mailing list
	discuss at lists.opensfs.org
	http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/discuss-opensfs.org
	


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensfs.org/pipermail/twg_lists.opensfs.org/attachments/20120430/918c4ba4/attachment.html>