[Twg] [Discuss] FW: OpenSFS TWG Requi... - Have we achieved the single-server MD...

[Alex Tomas]

hmm? pdirops is not supposed to improve directory listing, AFAIK.

thanks, Alex

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Nathan Rutman
<Nathan_Rutman at xyratex.com>wrote:

> pdirops was delivered, but the improvement results were somewhat
> disappointing.  I've seen no metrics for various directory listing
> improvements, although they may exist.
> Should we set a target rate? E.g. "ls -al" for a dir with 100K
> single-stripe files?
>
>
> On Apr 30, 2012, at 11:53 AM, John Carrier wrote:
>
> Nathan adds a good question:  metadata performance was the focus of our
> last RFP.  Are there any performance targets not covered by our current
> development contract?
> ** **
> --jc****
> ** **
> Nathan Rutman added a comment to OpenSFS TWG Requirements 2012<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gXs0VPaCNEU3l9OuXYmBCyxKEm3dkIV60smCVAD5Un8/edit?disco=AAAAAEv8ZFI>
> ****
> *Nathan Rutman*****
> Metadata server performance****
> Have we achieved the single-server MDS performance goals? Do we need to
> move some more solid requirements to 2012?****
> ** **
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at lists.opensfs.org
> http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/discuss-opensfs.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> twg mailing list
> twg at lists.opensfs.org
> http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/twg-opensfs.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensfs.org/pipermail/twg_lists.opensfs.org/attachments/20120430/2532f97c/attachment.html>