[cdwg] Wiki Update

[Christopher J. Morrone]

On 11/07/2012 02:07 PM, John Carrier wrote:
> I'm in favor of your option "C",  which I think is what is used by Wikipedia too.  For example, I can't make an immediate update to Wikipedia without being vetted by someone first. We don't need a moderator, just someone who authorizes access.  I think this model is effective and keeps the churn to a minimum.

Ok, that is fine with me.

With the clean URL design that I want for the wiki that are 
implementation-agnostic, we could even transition to another wiki 
package at some future date.  I see that there are content translators 
for Confluence, for instance, that will populate a Confluence instance 
from a MediaWiki instance.  The translation isn't perfect, of course, 
but the bulk of the content would, I presume, all copy over and appear 
at the same URLs.

Chris